Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

GEORGE A. SIMERMAN v. JOSEPH HACKENKAMP. Reported in 225 N.W. 915.

Case followed.

Decision controlled by Simerman v. Habisch, 178 Minn. 15, 225 N.W. 913, opinion filed herewith.

PER CURIAM.

After verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding. That motion was denied and judgment entered for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals. The case was argued and submitted with Simerman v. Habisch, 178 Minn. 15, 225 N.W. 913, opinion in which is filed herewith, and is so similar on its facts as to be controlled by that decision. Defendant's testimony was that he signed what later appeared to be the promissory note in suit upon the representation and believing that he was signing a paper only for the purpose of giving the stock salesmen his name and address.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIMERMAN v. HACKENKAMP
(Jun 21, 1929)