Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. BEEBE.

BRUNOT, J.

The accused was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of "possessing liquor for sale." A motion for a new trial Was filed, heard, and overruled. A bill of exception was reserved to this ruling, which is the only bill this appeal presents for consideration. The accused has not made an appearance in this court and has not filed a brief in the case. There is no error patent on the face of the record.

The motion for a new trial is a lengthy document purporting to be a statement of facts, which the minutes of the court and the judge's per curiam to the bill show are erroneous allegations.

It is the rule that the facts as they are stated by the court control. For authorities see 2 La. Dig. § 562, p. 734. Moreover, motions for new trial rest within the exercise of the sound discretion of the trial judge. 2 La. Dig. § 432, p. 666; article 516, Code of Criminal Procedure.

For the reasons stated, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BEEBE
(Jun 17, 1929)