Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES v. BOSTON MAINE R.R.

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case raised the question whether the payment by the lessee, under the covenants of its lease, of income taxes assessable against the lessor constitute additional taxable income to such lessor. On May 2, 1928, this question was certified to the Supreme Court of the United States [ 33 F.2d 889] under section 239 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 346). In an opinion of June 3, 1929, the Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative (United States v. Boston Maine Railroad, 49 S. Ct. 505, 73 L. Ed. ___), and by mandate dated July 5, 1929, directed this court to take further proceedings in conformity therewith.

Pursuant thereto, the judgment of the District Court [ 23 F.2d 343] is reversed, and the case is remanded to that court, with directions to enter judgment for the United States.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. BOSTON MAINE R.R
(Jul 8, 1929)