Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ALEX SHOLUND, Appellant.

APPEAL AND ERROR (287) — STATEMENT OF FACTS — TIME FOR FILING. A statement of facts served and filed out of time will be stricken on motion.

SAME (282) — STATEMENT OF FACTS — NECESSITY. Instructions will not be reviewed where the only exceptions appear in the statement of facts, which was stricken.

FRENCH, J.

Appellant was charged, by information filed in the superior court of Snohomish county, with the crime of possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same. Thereafter he was tried, convicted and sentenced, and this appeal follows.

There is but one assignment of error on which appellant relies for reversal, and that is the giving of a certain instruction which, appellant claims, does not correctly state the law.

[1] The respondent moves to strike the statement of facts for the reason that the same was not served or filed within the time permitted. The record shows that the trial took place on March 27, 1928, that the appellant was sentenced on April 9, 1928, and that on that day motion for new trial was denied and notice of appeal given in open court. The statement of facts in this case was served on January 16, 1929, and the same was filed January 17, 1929. Under the repeated holdings of this court, the statement of facts must be stricken. In re Rotter's Estate, 148 Wn. 285, 268 P. 866; Chelan Electric Co. v. Wick, 148 Wn. 479, 269 P. 827.

[2] The only exceptions taken to the instructions given appear in the statement of facts, and, the statement of facts having been stricken, this court will not review the instructions in the absence of exceptions taken thereto. State v. Goddard, 132 Wn. 286, 231 P. 794.

Judgment affirmed.

PARKER, MILLARD, BEALS, and MAIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SHOLUND
(Aug 13, 1929)