AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LANDIS SHOE COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. No principles of taxation of general interest are involved, and the case depends on its own particular facts growing out of the exchange of the capital stock of one company for the stock of another, and an agreement that the profit realized from the sale of the finished goods the Landis Company had on hand should be prorated and a proper share allocated to the Landis shareholders. The entire facts and all phases of the case are stated, discussed and disposed of in the opinion of the Tax Board. Finding no error, therefore, and regarding an opinion of this court as necessarily but a restatement, we limit ourselves to affirming the judgment of the Tax Board.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LANDIS SHOE CO. v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(Sep 4, 1929)