Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Henry FAUCETT v. STATE.

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully transporting whisky in quantities in excess of five gallons.

This record presents a plain, simple question of fact. The deputy sheriff, testifying as a witness for the state, says he did; the defendant, testifying as a witness, says he did not. The jury, weighing all the facts, found the defendant guilty.

Under the plainest rules governing such cases the appellate court would not be justified in disturbing the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAUCETT v. STATE
(Oct 8, 1929)