Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Russell Lumber Supply Company v. Grooms.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY DRURY, COMMISSIONER

Affirming.

The Russell Lumber Supply Company, which we shall call the plaintiff sued Mrs. Alice Grooms for $1,094.25 for building material it sold Philipps Simpson, which they used in remodeling a house for her. The court peremptorily directed a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment which followed plaintiff appeals.

The evidence is that Mrs. Grooms employed Philipps Simpson to remodel a house for her. They were to do this work and furnish this material for $4,700. Plaintiff sold and charged this material to them. Plaintiff failed to file a lien for this material but sued Mrs. Grooms for the bill.

The peremptory instruction was properly given for two reasons: Plaintiff failed to prove Mrs. Grooms promised to pay for this material sold to Philipps Simpson, and also failed to allege she made such a promise, thus failing both in its proof and its pleading. To avoid a peremptory instruction a plaintiff must have a cause of action both proven and pleaded. Utterback v. Quick, 230 Ky. 333, 19 S.W.2d 980.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUSSELL LUMBER SUPPLY CO. v. GROOMS
(Nov 15, 1929)