Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

In re ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO.

(Syllabus.)

Municipal Corporations — Tax Levy to Pay Interest on Bonded Indebtedness Maturing Subsequent to Fiscal Year Illegal.

An excise board is without authority of law to make an appropriation for the payment of interest on outstanding bonded indebtedness which matures subsequent to the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made.

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Tax Review sustaining the protest of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, against illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, by the county excise board of Tulsa county. Protestee appeals.

The ground of the protest was that the levy made for sinking fund purposes for the city of Tulsa included an amount which the city contends is necessary to pay interest accruals for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.

The Court of Tax Review held that this levy was illegal to the extent of the interest accruals for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.

We discussed this identical question in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8, 285 P. 48, and there held the levy excessive and illegal. We there said:

"An excise board is without authority of law to make an appropriation for the payment of interest on outstanding bonded indebtedness which matures subsequent to the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made."

We announce the same ruling here.

The judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

MASON, C. J., LESTER, V. C. J., and HUNT, RILEY, HEFNER, and CULLISON, JJ., concur. CLARK and SWINDALL, JJ., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO
(Dec 10, 1929)