AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PETROLEUM NAV. CO. v. INTRACOASTAL TOWING TRANSP. CO.

In Admiralty. Libel by the Petroleum Navigation Company against the Intracoastal Towing Transportation Company. On exceptions to the sufficiency of libel.

Exceptions sustained.

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

Respondent excepts to the allegations of the libel, which in the libel are stated as follows: "By reason of the premises the libellant has sustained damage in the cost of necessary repairs to said barge Norsworthy, towage, dry dockage, survey fees, and of the services of the barge Old Hickory, Barge Norco, tug Delamar, Tug H.H. Colle, and tug Adler, and other necessary and proper expenses amounting in all to the sum of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars, or thereabouts, no part of which has been paid to the libellant although payment thereof has been duly demanded."

The point they make is that the amount attributed to each of the subdivisions of the claim should be stated with some fair approximation.

In reply to the exceptions, libelant takes the position that, since the damages are a matter of proof before a commissioner, and not a part of the preliminary trial on the merits, the exceptions should be overruled, citing to his position Coronet Phosphate Co. v. United States Shipping Co. (D.C.) 260 F. 846; The Fort Gaines (D.C.) 21 F.2d 865, 1927 A.M.C. 1778; W.R. Grace Co. v. Luckenbach (D.C.) 248 F. 953; The James E. Newsome (D.C.) 14 F.2d 244, 1926 A.M.C. 1154.

It seems to me that the proper solution of the matter lies here; that ordinarily, in the absence of a request for specifications by way of exceptions, the damage as pleaded by libelant should be regarded as sufficient. In view of the exceptions, however, and the statement in the brief of respondent that it is in a position to furnish the information desired, it seems to me the exceptions should be sustained.

It is not meant by this ruling to establish a practice requiring such specification, but merely that where it is made to appear upon the hearing of such exceptions that the information is at hand, the court should direct libelant, either by amendment or in the way of a bill of particulars, to furnish the information desired.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PETROLEUM NAV. v. INTRACST. TOWING TRAN., (S.D.Tex. 1930)
(Jan 3, 1930)