Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OLDHAM v. UNITED STATES.

PER CURIAM.

G.W. Oldham was convicted and sentenced upon three counts of an information charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed.

Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty is the sole error assigned. We cannot consider this assignment because there is no proper bill of exceptions. Instead, there is a literal transcript of all the proceedings at the trial. Tingley v. United States (C.C.A. 10) 34 F.2d 1; Caldwell v. United States (C.C.A. 10) 36 F.2d 738; Davis v. United States (C.C.A. 10) 38 F.2d 631.

The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLDHAM v. UNITED STATES
(Feb 8, 1930)