Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILSON BANKING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In the above entitled and numbered cause, comes the respondent, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, by his attorneys, G.A. Youngquist, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, and C.M. Charest, Esq., General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and confesses that in the record and proceedings had before the United States Board of Tax Appeals there is reversible error, in so far as the decision of the board is based upon the view that section 278 of the Revenue Act of 1924 ( 43 Stat. 299) enlarges the time within which collection may be made where assessment of the tax was made prior to the effective date of the Revenue Act of 1924. Because of said error so confessed, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said United States Board of Tax Appeals in said cause be and the same is reversed, and that said cause be and it is hereby remanded to said United States Board of Tax Appeals for further proceedings.

It is further ordered that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILSON BANKING COMPANY v. C.I.R
(Feb 4, 1930)