Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

BETTY LUNENFELD, Plaintiff, v. MORITZ LUNENFELD, Defendant. See, also, 137 Misc. 417.

LEWIS, J.

The defendant has made all payments of alimony pursuant to the order in the separation suit until the entry of the interlocutory decree of annulment in his favor. The latter decree did not dissolve the marriage. ( Matter of Crandall, 196 N.Y. 127.) Nor did it affect the provision made for the payment of temporary alimony in the wife's action. ( Burton v. Burton, 150 A.D. 790, 791.) The defendant should have moved for an order relieving him from the payment of alimony after the entry of the interlocutory judgment of annulment. Had such a motion been made it would undoubtedly have been granted, for it does not appear that the interlocutory judgment was erroneously granted or would be reversed on appeal. ( Poss v. Poss, 164 A.D. 213.) In the exercise of discretion, therefore, the motion to punish the defendant for contempt is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LUNENFELD v. LUNENFELD
(Feb 17, 1930)