Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENRY GROTE v. MRS. CHARLES STANLEY ROGERS. HELEN RIDDLE

Decided March 13th, 1930.

A per curiam opinion was delivered as follows:

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Sophie Grote v. Mrs. Charles Stanley Rogers, being No. 28 on the docket of the present term, the similar orders in the cases of Henry Grote, Helen Riddle and J. Frank Riddle, against the same appellee, being Nos. 29, 30 and 31, on the docket of the present term, and involving the same question. are hereby affirmed with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GROTE v. ROGERS
(Mar 13, 1930)