Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

H. C. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. HENRY H. FILER, et als., Appellees.

PER CURIAM. —

Upon this cause having been set down for oral argument the appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Under the provisions of Rule 23 for the government of the Supreme Court, the appellant has the right to pursue this course and there having been no cross assignments of error filed by the appellees, and the cause not having been reached for final disposition by the Court at the time when this motion was filed the Court is bound by the provisions of the rule. The motion should, therefore, be granted and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

TERRELL, C. J., AND ELLIS, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

BROWN, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMPSON v. FILER ET ALS
(Mar 12, 1930)