AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JONAS-CADILLAC CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

The questions involved in this appeal relate to the period for which the income and profits tax return was made, whether for a fiscal or a calendar year. No question of fact is involved, nor any contention respecting the amount of the deficiency, if the method adopted by the Commissioners and approved by the Board of Tax Appeals is the correct one.

In respect to this we see no reason for amending or supplementing the findings of fact and the opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals as reported in 16 B.T.A. 932; and, approving them as we do, the judgment of the Board favorable to respondent herein is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JONAS-CADILLAC CO. v. COM'R OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(May 28, 1930)