LYTLE v. MILLER, CLERK OF COURT

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12954

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Nichols, Wyche Byrnes, for appellants, cite: Personal presence of defendant not necessary at publication of sentence for misdemeanor: 1 Code 1922, Sec. 75; 8 R.C. L., 234; 16 C.J., 1293. Messrs. T.H. Munro and L.K. Jennings, for respondents, cite: Sealed sentence is not judgment of the Court until opened and read to defendant: 5 Strob., 88.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

12954

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Nichols, Wyche Byrnes, for appellants, cite: Personal presence of defendant not necessary at publication of sentence for misdemeanor: 1 Code 1922, Sec. 75; 8 R.C. L., 234; 16 C.J., 1293. Messrs. T.H. Munro and L.K. Jennings, for respondents, cite: Sealed sentence is not judgment of the Court until opened and read to defendant: 5 Strob., 88.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LYTLE v. MILLER, CLERK OF COURT, ET AL.

July 23, 1930. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE CARTER.

The facts and issues involved in the appeal in this case are set forth in the order of his Honor, Judge T.S. Sease, who heard the cause, and, for the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge Sease, in deciding the case in favor of the plaintiff-respondent, the exceptions are overruled and the judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, BLEASE and STABLER concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

LYTLE v. MILLER, CLERK OF COURT, ET AL.

Comments