Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. EISLER et al.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court dismissing the bill filed in the above-stated cause on the ground that claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 14 of the Mitchell White patent, No. 1,453,594, claim No. 7 of the Mitchell White patent, No. 1,453,595, and claims 2 and 6 of the Marshall patent, No. 1,475,192, are invalid because of the lack of invention. We agree with the conclusions of the learned District Judge, and affirm the decree on his opinion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. EISLER
(Sep 5, 1930)