AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE SIXTY-SEVEN SOUTH MUNN, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLICUTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, CAMPBELL, BODINE, DALY, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIXTY-SEVEN S. MUNN v. BD. OF PUB. UTIL. COMM'S, N.J
(Oct 20, 1930)