Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TOWN OF ROCKINGHAM v. MRS. QUEEN COLEY.

Pleadings A c — Motion to be allowed to amend is addressed to discretion of trial court, and his disposition thereof is not reviewable.

As to whether a party to an action be allowed to amend his pleadings is ordinarily a question directed to the discretion of the trial judge and not reviewable on appeal.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to recover $705.63 as assessments on the defendant's abutting lot for improvements made by the plaintiff in 1914 on Washington and Randolph streets. The defendant denied liability and pleaded the statute of limitations. When the case was called for trial the plaintiff made a motion to amend its complaint by pleading chapters 309 and 326 of the Private Laws of 1911. The motion was denied and the plaintiff excepted.

The appellant admits that the action cannot be maintained unless the amendment is allowed. Whether a pleading shall be amended is ordinarily a matter within the discretion of the judge or the trial court, and the exercise of discretion is not reviewable except for palpable abuse. Gordon v. Gas Co., 178 N.C. 435. We find nothing in the record which tends to indicate an abuse of discretion by the judge who presided at the trial. Judgment

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROCKINGHAM v. COLEY
(Nov 1, 1930)