Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLAD REIDHEAD, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny and has appealed to this court. No brief has been filed on his behalf, but we have examined the record for fundamental error. The information charges the offense of grand larceny, and the verdict of the jury found the defendant guilty thereof. The minutes show that the proceedings were in all respects regular, and no error of law appears on the face of the record.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REIDHEAD v. STATE
(Dec 1, 1930)