AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KIYO NAKAMORI, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

Judgments affirmed. No opinion.

O'Malley, J., dissents.

O'MALLEY, J. (dissenting).

While the evidence was sufficient to justify a finding that the defendants were guilty of knowingly possessing lottery tickets, described in the evidence as "Chinese policy" slips, they were not proven guilty of the crime charged in the informations — the possession of policy slips which relate to the drawing of numbers. The case comes within the principle of our decision in People v. Lyttle ( 225 App. Div. 299; affd., 251 N.Y. 347). I, therefore, vote for a reversal of the judgments of conviction and for a dismissal of the informations.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NAKAMORI
(Dec 1, 1930)