Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NIENHUIS v. BULTMAN.

FEAD, J.

This case is similar to and is ruled by the decision in Timmerman v. Bultman, ante, 99, handed down herewith.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded to the circuit court, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $2,120, with interest at five per cent. from February 16, 1927. Plaintiff will have costs of both courts.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, and NORTH, JJ., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NIENHUIS v. BULTMAN
(Jan 7, 1931)