Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BILL HAYDEN et al. v. STATE.

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Conviction for Possession Sustained.

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Beckham county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of whisky; defendant Nichols was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail; defendant Hayden was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The record discloses that defendants were operating a filling station near the town of Sayre. Certain officers with a search warrant went to the place and made a search. Nothing was found in the building, but some twenty steps from the rear a bottle containing a small quantity of whisky was found, and in the building were found two cases of empty new pint bottles, and about forty yards north of the filling station in the field the officers found a sack with seven pint bottles of whisky in it. There was a trail leading from the filling station near to the spot where the whisky was found. There was some other evidence tending to show intent.

The principal contention made is that the evidence is not sufficient to show that defendant had possession of the whisky found. The evidence is circumstantial, but is sufficient from which the legal and reasonable inference of guilt arises.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAYDEN ET AL. v. STATE
(Feb 7, 1931)