ARMSTRONG GROCER CO. v. SMITH-ALFORD SIGN SERV, Fla., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Thomas N. Tappy, for Plaintiff in Error
P. W. Harvey, for Defendant in

Judges

PER CURIAM. —

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Thomas N. Tappy, for Plaintiff in Error
P. W. Harvey, for Defendant in

Judges

PER CURIAM. —

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ARMSTRONG GROCER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, Plaintiff in Error, vs. SMITH-ALFORD SIGN SERVICE, INC., a Corporation, Defendant in Error. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, a Municipal Corporation, Garnishee.

PER CURIAM. —

The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Tyler vs. Akerman, et al., 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838, and cases there cited. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J.J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

ARMSTRONG GROCER CO. v. SMITH-ALFORD SIGN SERV

ARMSTRONG GROCER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, Plaintiff in Error, vs. SMITH-ALFORD SIGN SERVICE, INC., a Corporation, Defendant in Error. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, a Municipal Corporation, Garnishee.

Comments