Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

FAIREY ET AL. v. HILDEBRAND.

March 23, 1931. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE.Page 520

It is well established that in a law case this Court will not disturb findings of fact of the probate Court, concurred in by the Circuit Court, when there is any evidence to support such findings. It is needless to cite any of the many authorities sustaining this proposition. There was evidence in this case to warrant the findings of fact of the Probate Judge, which were approved, on appeal by the Circuit Judge.

We find no error of law in the holdings of the Circuit Judge. The decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAIREY et al. v. HILDEBRAND
(Mar 23, 1931)