Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LEO DAY vs. MICHAEL KANE AND EDWARD F. KANE.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff as the result of being struck by an automobile owned by the defendants and by their agent operated as a public car. The plaintiff was the sole witness giving testimony as to the accident itself. The jury returned a verdict in his favor in the sum of $841.67. The case is before this Court on general motion.

The evidence contained in the record clearly establishes the negligence of the defendants, and there is nothing to indicate to this Court that the jury was not fully justified in finding that the plaintiff was free from negligence.

The contention of the defendants that the jury was not warranted in finding that the car which struck the plaintiff belonged to them is not sustained. The evidence was sufficient to establish the contrary fact that it did belong to them.

No question is raised as to the amount of the verdict. The entry will be, Motion overruled. John H. Needham and S. F. Needham, for plaintiff. George E. Thompson and A. M. Rudman, for defendants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAY v. KANE
(Apr 4, 1931)