(Syllabus.)
Injunction — Injunction Against Drilling Oil Wells in City Limits Sustained.
Record examined. The action of the lower court in awarding injunction in favor of the defendant in error, and in refusing injunction in favor of plaintiffs in error is affirmed.
KORNEGAY, J.
This is a companion case to the case of Walter H. Gant, Knox L. Garvin, and A.D. Hudspeth, Plaintiffs in Error, v. City of Oklahoma City et al., Defendants in Error, No. 21798, decided this day, 150 Okla. 86, ___ Pac. ___, the difference being that the locality is slightly different, but the wells are in the corporate limits of Oklahoma City, and are subject to the same regulations.
On the authority of Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al., No. 21798, 150 Okla. 86, ___ Pac. ___, this case is affirmed.
LESTER, C. J., and CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and McNEILL, JJ., concur. RILEY and HEFNER, JJ., absent. CLARK, V. C. J., dissents.