Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Arthur H. FLEMING, Plaintiff in Error, v. Da

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered orders of redetermination of Board of Tax Appeals in above cause corrected to show that the unpaid portion of the correct tax liability of the plaintiffs in error for the calendar years 1917 to 1920, inclusive, is as follows:

A.H. Fleming J.F. Lloyd-Smith

1917 $1,039.53 $15,327.26 1918 3,040.93 28,894.08 1919 5,425.70 18,659.27 1920 3,180.70 19,562.62

— that judgment accordingly be entered in this court; mandate of this court to issue forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FLEMING v. BURNET
(May 18, 1931)