Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ED S. VAIL BUTTERINE CO. v. Mabel G. REINECKE, Collector of Internal Re

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of the present oleomargarine law, being Act Aug. 2, 1886, 24 Stat. 209, as amended by Act May 9, 1902, 32 Stat. 193. The question is presented by the court's ruling in sustaining appellee's demurrer to appellant's declaration. Appellant admits that to sustain its appeal it will be necessary for this court to rule contrary to the law as announced in McCray v. United States, 195 U.S. 27, 24 S. Ct. 769, 49 L. Ed. 78, 1 Ann. Cas. 561. This we decline to do.

The judgment of the District Court sustaining appellee's demurrer to appellant's declaration is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ED S. VAIL BUTTERINE CO. v. REINECKE
(May 23, 1931)