Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

BERNETTA V. ZIEGLER, et al., Appellants, vs. FORT LAUDERDALE SECURITIES CO., et al., Appellees.

PER CURIAM. —

A married woman not a free dealer borrowed $10,000.00 for which she alone gave a note and executed a mortgage upon her separate real property. The mortgage being unenforcible because the husband did not join in executing it, proceedings were brought to subject in equity the same separate real property of the married woman for the payment of the money due by her upon an agreement in writing for the benefit of her separate property under section 2, Article XI of the constitution. See Vance v. Jacksonville R. M. Co., 69 Fla. 33, 67 So. 636.

The orders and decrees appealed from are in substantial compliance with the requirements of law and rules of procedure and no reversible errors being made to appear, such orders and decrees are affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.

BUFORD, C.J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZIEGLER ET AL. v. FT. LAUDERDALE SEC. CO
(Jul 7, 1931)