Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ED. JOHNSON, RESPONDENT, v. STEPHEN MATTICE ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Decided September 8, 1931.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for laches by reason of appellants' failure to file the transcript as required by Rule IV of this court; but appellants are granted the privilege of moving to reinstate the same, if good cause therefor is shown within twenty days.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. MATTICE
(Sep 8, 1931)