Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

BERTIE STUBBS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF ROBERT W. STUBBS, v. CHICAGO MILL AND LUMBER CORPORATION AND W. B. EBNER.

Removal of Causes C b — Allegations in petition for removal will be taken as true, plaintiff having right to join issue or move for remand.

Where a nonresident defendant files petition and bond for the removal of a cause from the State to the Federal Court upon diversity of citizenship and pending of the same action in the Federal Court, and the amount is jurisdictional in the latter Court, for the purpose of the motion the statement contained in the petition is taken as true, the plaintiff having the right to answer, join issue with the petition or move to remand from the District to the State Court, and the defendant's petition to remove the cause as prayed, should be allowed.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for personal injury resulting in the death of the plaintiff's intestate. The defendant Ebner is a resident of Washington County, North Carolina, and the Chicago Mill and Lumber Corporation is a corporation created and organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. The amount in controversy exceeds $3,000 exclusive of interest and costs.

The corporate defendant filed a petition for the removal of the cause to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, specifically and fully setting out the grounds of the motion: not only diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder of parties, but the pending of substantially the same cause of action in the District Court. Stubbs v. Chicago Mill and Lumber Corporation et al., 199 N.C. 807. The statements contained in the petition must for the purpose of the motion be taken as true, the plaintiff having the right to answer, join issue with the petition or move to remand from the District Court to the State Court. Wilson v. Republic Iron Steel Co., 257 U.S. 92, 66 L.Ed., 144.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STUBBS v. LUMBER CORP
(Sep 1, 1931)