1. The right of the husband to choose the marital domicile is unquestionable and his demand, under the circumstances of this case were not unreasonable. Held, the desertion was that of the complaining wife.
2. Even were the desertion that of the defendant husband, his subsequent advances, sincere and bona fide, and the complainant's refusal to submit to those advances, clearly make her the deserter in the final analysis.
3. Condonation is an affirmative defense and the burden of proving it is on the one asserting it.
PER CURIAM.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Berry.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSUTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.