Whether a conveyance is or is not fraudulent is entirely a factual question. Held, the conveyance in this case is fraudulent.
PER CURIAM.
The judges being equally divided on the question whether the decree should be reversed, the decree is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.
The decree appealed from is affirmed by an equally divided court.
For affirmance — PARKER, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, WELLS, JJ. 7.
For reversal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 7.