AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DAN W. FEITEL BAG COMPANY, LTD., Respondent, v. MAXIM BOBINSKI, Appellant.

Order denying motion to change place of trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Appeal from order denying defendant's motion for a reargument dismissed, without costs. The action not being one specified in either section 182 or 183 of the Civil Practice Act, and the plaintiff being a foreign corporation and having no residence in the county of Kings within the meaning of section 182 of the Civil Practice Act, the defendant is entitled, as a matter of right, to have the trial of the case in Suffolk county, where he resides. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Sic. See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 183, 184. — [REP.

Amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 493. — [REP.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAN W. FEITEL BAG COMPANY, LTD. v. BOBINSKI
(Dec 1, 1931)