Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARRY W. HECHT, Appellant, vs. RUTH T. CARDINAL, joined by her husband and next friend, LOUIS L. CARDINAL, Appellees.

BUFORD, C.J. —

This was a suit to cancel a tax deed. General and special demurrers were filed attacking a second amended bill of complaint. The demurrers were overruled, from which order appealed was taken.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed upon authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Tax Securities Corporation, a Florida Corporation vs. Peggie Borland, et al., opinion filed at this term of Court. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS AND BROWN, J.J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

DAVIS, J. (concurring): —

The object of the bill, and its prayer, is to cancel the tax deed, not the liability of the land to the tax attempted to be assessed. This deed, if all statutory steps have been followed, conveys title in itself, but if not, it as a deed may be decreed to be invalid and the holder of it remitted to his appropriate remedy under Sec. 1026 C. G. L., 795, R. G. S. See San Sebastian Development Corp. vs. Couch, decided at the present term, and the case cited in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice BUFORD above.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HECHT v. CARDINAL
(Dec 21, 1931)