Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • M. Michael Edelstein, of New York City, for appellants David Brown and Abe Lieberman, appearing specially. George Z. Medalie, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Earle N. Bishopp, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N.Y., and Leonard J. Obermeier, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Judges
  • Martin Thomas Manton
  • Harrie Brigham Chase
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • M. Michael Edelstein, of New York City, for appellants David Brown and Abe Lieberman, appearing specially. George Z. Medalie, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Earle N. Bishopp, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N.Y., and Leonard J. Obermeier, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Judges
  • Martin Thomas Manton
  • Harrie Brigham Chase
See more information ...
Smart Summary

UNITED STATES v. BROWN et al.

PER CURIAM.

There was sufficient evidence to support the finding that Brown and Lieberman were the owners of the business; that a common nuisance was permitted by the owners to exist at the premises in violation of the Prohibition Act (27 USCA); but not enough was done under the special appearance for Lieberman to amount to submission to the jurisdiction. United States v. Collins and Lawlor (C.C.A.) 55 F.2d 70.

Decree modified to vacate the personal injunction against Lieberman and in all other respects affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

UNITED STATES v. BROWN
(Jan 18, 1932)