Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. J.E. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

ON REHEARING.

HOLCOMB, J.

After full consideration on rehearing En Banc, we are of the opinion that the conviction and sentence on the third count in the information, is not sustained by any evidence of guilt of the charge.

The judgment and sentence upon the third count is therefore reversed and set aside. To that extent, the decision in 163 Wn. 419, 1 P.2d 307, is modified.

The judgment and sentence on the first count is well supported by competent evidence, and we find that the errors assigned respecting that charge and conviction are not well taken.

The judgment and sentence upon count one remains in full force and effect, undisturbed by this decision. State v. McCourt, 157 Wn. 499, 289 P. 41.

Appellant, having obtained a more favorable judgment here, will recover costs of appeal.

All concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WILLIAMS
(Feb 17, 1932)