Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE HUSTLER. THE BLEAKLEY NO. 76. CARBONATE OF LIME CORPORATION v. DANIEL ROE TOWING TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc.

Libel by the Carbonate of Lime Corporation, owner of a cargo of carbonate of lime, against the Daniel Roe Towing Transportation Company, Inc., with the steam tug Hustler, her engines, etc., and the barge Bleakley No. 76, her tackle, etc., impleaded. On exceptions to the special commissioner's report.

Exceptions sustained.

MACK, Circuit Judge.

The question presented on the exceptions is whether or not the cargo owner can hold the Hustler for any part of the expenses incurred by it in removing and dumping the damaged cargo.

The special commissioner has found in favor of the cargo owner. In my opinion, error has been committed in this respect, in view of the evidence that the sound cargo was first removed. After the sound cargo had been removed, the cargo owner was under no obligation to the tort-feasors, as such, to do anything in respect to the damaged cargo, inasmuch as any water damage was fatal to the cargo and made it a total loss. If, in order to rescue the sound cargo, it had become necessary to unload or even to dump all or some of the damaged cargo, a different question would be presented, but that is not the situation before me.

Unless the parties agree upon the apportionment of the expenses as between the sound and the unsound cargo, the matter will be rereferred to the special commissioner for determination thereof.

The second exception involving a few cents in calculation is conceded to be well taken.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE HUSTLER, (S.D.N.Y. 1932)
(Feb 8, 1932)