Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM TEPLITZKY, Appellant, v. WILLIAM LIPPMAN and Another, Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. ( Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 A.D. 714.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, LYDON, FRANKENTHALER and UNTERMYER, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TEPLITZKY v. LIPPMAN
(Mar 25, 1932)