AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAMMOND BAG PAPER CO. v. BAG MACHINE CORPORATION.

At Law. Action by Hammond Bag Paper Company against Bag Machine Corporation. On motion for bill of particulars.

Motion granted.

NIELDS, District Judge.

This is an action at law to recover threefold damages under the Clayton Anti-Trust Act § 4 and Sherman Anti-Trust Act § 7 ( 15 USCA § 15), alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff.

The matter now before the court is defendant's motion for a bill of particulars in such an action. The Conformity Act (28 USCA § 724) and the state cases do not deprive the federal court of the right to exercise its discretion in the matter. Upon the authority of Locker v. American Tobacco Co. (D.C.) 194 F. 232; Alaska S.S. Co. v. Katzeek, 16 F.2d 210 (C.C.A. 9); and Harry Prochaska, Inc. v. Consolidated Lithographing Corp. (D.C.) 51 F.2d 362, defendant's motion will be granted to the extent indicated at the hearing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAMMOND BAG PAPER CO. v. BAG MACH. CORP., (D.Del. 1932)
(Apr 5, 1932)