Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IDEA RESTAINO, respondent, v. CHARLES F. RESTAINO, appellant.

1. The testimony of the petitioning wife makes out a clear case of extreme cruelty.

2. The rule of corroboration only requires that belief in its truthfulness must find support in the testimony of others, or of surrounding established circumstances. This requirement has been met.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Moore.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RESTAINO v. RESTAINO
(May 16, 1932)