Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELBRIDGE BALL v. MANN COMMISSION COMPANY.

1. — Practice in Supreme Court — Application for Writ of Error.

When Supreme Court is of opinion that Court of Civil Appeals has properly reversed and remanded a cause for another trial, it will dismiss the application for writ of error.

2. — Application for Writ of Error — Assignments of Error.

The Supreme Court will not pass upon question of whether company can maintain a suit when its right to do business has been forfeited for non-payment of franchise tax, when the application contains no assignment presenting such question.

PER CURIAM. —

1, 2 We have dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction because we believe the Court of Civil Appeals properly reversed and remanded this cause for another trial. We do not pass upon the question as to whether defendant in error is entitled to maintain this suit if its right to do business has been forfeited for non-payment of franchise tax, because the application for writ of error contains no assignment presenting such question.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BALL v. MANN COMMISSION CO
(May 21, 1932)