Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

ESTELLA JOYNER BAKER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MASSEY HARRIS COMPANY AND ZURICH GENERAL ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.

Master and Servant. Judgment based upon Workmen's Compensation Act held not reviewable on writ of error.

CAMPBELL, C.

The Workmen's Compensation Commission on January 16, 1930, made an award in favor of Estella Joyner Baker, defendant in error, and against Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident Liability Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error. The plaintiffs in error appealed from the award to the circuit court of Jackson county. Upon hearing of the appeal the award of the commission was, on September 10, 1930, affirmed. Plaintiffs in error now seek to have reviewed upon writ of error, the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission.

In the view we take of the case, further statement is unnecessary.

It has been determined that a judgment based upon the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be reviewed upon writ of error. [Wheat v. Globe Indemnity Company, 44 S.W.2d 168; Kristanik v. Motor Company, 41 S.W.2d 911; Daniels v. Box Company, 46 S.W.2d 1108.]

It follows that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission. The writ of error is dismissed. The commissioner so recommends. Boyer, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM:

The foregoing opinion of CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The writ of error is dismissed. All concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAKER v. MASSEY HARRIS CO
(May 23, 1932)