Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MUNGIN v. MUNGIN.

May 30, 1932. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE.

The appeal here is on the part of the defendant from an order of his Honor, Circuit Judge Grimball, allowing temporary alimony and attorney's fees to the plaintiff. It is not necessary to cite authorities to sustain the well-settled rule that the allowance of temporary alimony and attorney's fees is within the discretion of the Circuit Judge, and it is incumbent upon the appellant to show an abuse of discretion on the part of the Judge in his conclusions. There has been no such showing here; so the order appealed from is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MUNGIN v. MUNGIN
(May 30, 1932)