Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEE WHATLEY v. THE STATE.

Murder — Venire — Statute.

In prosecution for murder, the special venire should have been quashed, since it was drawn under a statute which was held in Smith v. State, 120 Tex.Crim. Rep., 49 S.W.2d 739, to be invalid because a local law in violation of article 3, section 56 of the Constitution.

CHRISTIAN, JUDGE. —

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

A former appeal is reported in 117 Tex.Crim. Rep., 36 S.W.2d at page 751.

The special venire from which the jury was selected was drawn from jurors selected under the provisions of chapter 151, Special Laws of the Forty-Second Legislature (1931), at its Regular Session. (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St., art. 2116a, secs. 1-5). Appellant made a motion to quash the venire on the ground that the act in question was a local law in violation of the provisions of article 3, section 56 of the Constitution of Texas. In the case of Cecil Smith v. the State of Texas,, 120 Tex. Crim. 431, 49 S.W.2d 739, delivered April 20, 1932, it was held that the act was invalid, in that it was a local law in violation of the provisions of article 3, section 56 of the Constitution.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHATLEY v. STATE
(Jun 8, 1932)