Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

GILBERT v. RORICK ET AL.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Weight or sufficiency of evidence.

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by virtue of Rule XIX of this Court, the Court finding that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, reversing that of the common pleas, was based, at least partly, on the ground that the judgment was not sustained by sufficient evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GILBERT v. RORICK
(May 25, 1932)