Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PRAIRIE PIPE LINE CO. v. HYDE et al.

(Syllabus.)

Master and Servant — Workmen's Compensation — Review of Awards — Sufficiency of Evidence.

An award of the State Industrial Commission will not be disturbed by this court where there is competent evidence reasonably tending to support the same.

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted by the respondent before the State Industrial Commission to review an award in favor of the claimant therein. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as petitioner and claimant, respectively.

There is competent evidence in the record reasonably tending to support the finding of the State Industrial Commission that the claimant received an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the petitioner, which resulted in a 70 per cent. permanent partial disability to the hand of the claimant. The claimant testified as to the injury and there was medical testimony as to the extent and duration of the disability.

In accordance with the statute applicable thereto, the petition to vacate the award is denied.

RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and CLARK, V. C. J., absent.

Note. — See under (1), annotation in L. R. A. 1916A, 266; L. R. A. 1917D, 186; 28 R. C. L. 828, 829; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 6254; R. C. L. Pocket Part, title Workmen's Compensation, § 116.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRAIRIE PIPE LINE CO. v. HYDE
(Jun 21, 1932)