Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SAUNDERS, Respondent, v. HOPKINS, et al, Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The case was tried upon its merits before the court without a jury, and a judgment was entered without the court having made findings of fact and conclusions of law. The judgment is, therefore, without any foundation upon which it may be based. See section 2526, Rev. Code 1919; Taylor v. Vandenberg, 15 S.D. 480, 90 N.W. 142; Kierbow v. Young 21 S.D. 180, 110 N.W. 116.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAUNDERS v. HOPKINS
(Jun 30, 1932)