AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. B.P. DUCAS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, against THE STATE TAX COMMISSION, Respondent.

Determination of the Appellate Division modified and the tax restated at $1,536.90, with costs to appellant in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the rule laid down in section 211 of the Tax Law, as it read in the year 1925 and as applicable to this proceeding, is too vague to state a workable rule. No opinion. (See 260 N.Y. 654.)

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE EX REL. B.P. DUCAS CO., INC. v. STATE TAX COMM
(Jul 19, 1932)